Building a Defense Against California Medical Board Discipline Triggered by Criminal Matters

The California Medical Board mandates the disclosure of felony charges (after an information has been filed in criminal court) and all misdemeanor convictions.  Also, through the California Department of Justice or the criminal courts, the Board sometimes is notified of a pending or completed criminal case.  Physicians also must answer background change questions (such as, have you been convicted of a crime?) on their license renewal forms.  Through one of these channels, the Medical Board typically becomes aware of a pending or completed criminal case that can trigger discipline.

Make Good Decisions from the Start of the Problem

To exercise effective damage control from the early days of the criminal matter, I strongly recommend having a license law attorney on one's legal team.  A license law attorney brings a long-term perspective of potential future license consequences that can educate the criminal defense attorney and his client.  One of the biggest mistakes that physicians make is to fail to appreciate the serious fallout and lasting career damage that can result from a criminal investigation or prosecution.

Documenting and Preserving Mitigating Information

One often missed step, important for successful handling of potential license problems, is to document and preserve mitigation evidence.  Mitigation evidence is evidence that tends to explain or provide a context for the alleged wrongful act to cast it in a more sympathetic, reasonable and understandable light.  Examples of mitigation evidence are a tragic life event, something that causes extreme stress such as the death of a parent or child, a bitter divorce, a severe illness, or extreme financial hardship.  Without important contextual information, the Board might assume that the criminal matter gives telling insight into the personal flaws of the Board's licensee from which the Board can generalize and make broader assumptions.

Criminal Defense with License Consequences in Mind

Criminal defense lawyers often focus upon the final conviction charge (case outcome) in attempting to minimize adverse effects on a physician's license.  This emphasis is too narrow and usually  misplaced.  If there is any conviction of a felony or misdemeanor, the Board can look through the conviction to the underlying facts.  Therefore the contents of the investigative reports, the rulings of the judge on issues such as bail or protective orders, the length and conditions of probation, and negotiated post-conviction relief, are all aspects of the case which have an impact upon whether the Board will seek discipline against a license, and what the disciplinary case outcome might be.

Early and Proactive Rehabilitative Efforts

Another often missed opportunity is the chance to make early and proactive rehabilitative efforts.  If the Board decides to discipline a physician's license, once a conviction is proven at hearing, the burden shifts to the licensee to show rehabilitation to enable the Board or administrative law judge to decide what, if any, discipline is appropriate.  Rehabilitation evidence is critical because the Board justifies discipline based upon criminal convictions by reasoning that criminal convictions show a character flaw, a lack of judgment, or impairment that endangers the public, depending upon the facts of the case.  To the degree that a physician can show the issues in the criminal case have been addressed or resolved by rehabilitative efforts, the justification for discipline may be reduced or removed, resulting in a better discipline case outcome, or perhaps even a case dismissal.

What Types of Cases Trigger Discipline

Unremarkable misdemeanor convictions that do not point to troubling concerns about the licensee are the most likely to not result in license discipline.  These would include low blood alcohol drunk driving cases, disturbing the peace based on loud noise or a fight between adults, some types of disorderly conduct, and misdemeanor Vehicle Code cases.  Criminal cases that are likely to trigger discipline are ones that point to drug or alcohol abuse, have facts that show or hint at mental illness, any type of theft or fraud, any violent crime, and any sex crime, to name some major categories.  Sexual offenses that result in conviction and mandated sex offender registration can trigger immediate license revocation.  To make a reasonable assessment of the potential Board reaction to a particular factual scenario, it is best to hire a license defense law firm to review the matter.  We offer consultations to review criminal matters to assess them for likely licensing outcomes, to identify mitigation evidence early and to build a rehabilitation case. 

Be Honest

It is crucial that a physician never lie to the Medical Board about a criminal case.  Direct dishonesty is typically more damaging than the criminal case itself.  I strongly recommend that the physician have an attorney review all their communications with the Board before they are sent, if for no other reason than to ensure that the information provided is accurate and that the exchanges are well documented.  The early involvement of a license defense attorney can ensure an honest, positive and consistent message that reassures the Medical Board and acts to prevent or minimize license discipline.

Medical Students, Medical Residents and Physician License Applicants

These principles apply to anyone applying to medical school, attending medical school, working in a medical residency, applying for a PTAL (foreign medical school graduate's residency permit) or seeking a California physician's license.  The earlier the issue is addressed, the better.  If the background problem is so serious that it will jeopardize the physician's licensing process, the problem must be identified early so that the individual can consider options and plan for overcoming impediments to obtaining a full clear physician's license.

 

 

Is California the Strictest State for Professional Licensing?

At the firm we get calls from all types of licensees from jurisdictions around the country.  Many individuals, having had no problems in other states, are surprised when California denies their license application or comes after their license.  This has led us to often observe that California may be the strictest state for license discipline.   But is California really the strictest?  Mostly, it depends upon what type of license you have.

California's Medical Board is famously strict.  The background questions on the Med Board's application are extensive.  The background check is thorough.  Any blemish on an applicant's record, it seems, is cause for further investigation and often denial.  The Medical Board looks for mental illness, substance abuse, chemical dependency, deviancy, anger problems, lack of skill, dishonesty, etc., etc.  It is not surprising that almost 1,000 applications out of 5,000 are denied.

In contrast, California's nursing boards (registered nursing and vocational nursing) seem to be more lenient.  In part, this could be due to California's famous nursing shortage and mandated nurse-patient ratios.  However, this could be changing.  California's nursing boards have come into criticism for not checking into the backgrounds of nurse license applicants, leading to, among other stories, a nurse who is validly licensed while in prison.   

Another notable "strictest" is the California Department of Insurance.  If I only had a dime for every call where someone had "no trouble at all" with the 30 other states that had licenses from, only to encounter problems with California.  But who can blame the Department of Insurance?  After the Chuck Quackenbush scandal, where our Commissioner went easy on disciplining insurance companies that supported him politically, the Department of Insurance still wants to avoid any appearance of impropriety at all costs. 

One area where California seems to be the leader is in splashing license discipline all over the internet.  These efforts range from the Medical Board's e-mail notifications to posting disciplinary documents on the internet by most boards and departments.  It is also little-known that most California licensing agencies have the option of pressing ahead with license discipline even when an applicant wishes to withdraw an application or a licensee want to surrender a license.  Once a board has learned of an applicant's or licensee's problem, they close off the exits.  Not allowing for a quiet resolution by withdrawal or surrender, they insist on making a public record of license discipline.  In this post-practical obscurity age, California leads the way in publicizing its licensees shortcomings for the good of the public.  We'll talk about practical obscurity in another blog.

So is California the strictest?  I think so.  As long as our golden shores beckon to professionals all over this country and the world, we can afford to be strict.  Not only is our native population overflowing - our great weather, huge market for services, and diversity make California irresistable.  So long as this is true, California licensing agencies will probe for faults, expose and punish.  It is sad that I must, from time to time, tell a client - "go east - they're more forgiving over there."