Building a Defense Against California Medical Board Discipline Triggered by Criminal Matters

The California Medical Board mandates the disclosure of felony charges (after an information has been filed in criminal court) and all misdemeanor convictions.  Also, through the California Department of Justice or the criminal courts, the Board sometimes is notified of a pending or completed criminal case.  Physicians also must answer background change questions (such as, have you been convicted of a crime?) on their license renewal forms.  Through one of these channels, the Medical Board typically becomes aware of a pending or completed criminal case that can trigger discipline.

Make Good Decisions from the Start of the Problem

To exercise effective damage control from the early days of the criminal matter, I strongly recommend having a license law attorney on one's legal team.  A license law attorney brings a long-term perspective of potential future license consequences that can educate the criminal defense attorney and his client.  One of the biggest mistakes that physicians make is to fail to appreciate the serious fallout and lasting career damage that can result from a criminal investigation or prosecution.

Documenting and Preserving Mitigating Information

One often missed step, important for successful handling of potential license problems, is to document and preserve mitigation evidence.  Mitigation evidence is evidence that tends to explain or provide a context for the alleged wrongful act to cast it in a more sympathetic, reasonable and understandable light.  Examples of mitigation evidence are a tragic life event, something that causes extreme stress such as the death of a parent or child, a bitter divorce, a severe illness, or extreme financial hardship.  Without important contextual information, the Board might assume that the criminal matter gives telling insight into the personal flaws of the Board's licensee from which the Board can generalize and make broader assumptions.

Criminal Defense with License Consequences in Mind

Criminal defense lawyers often focus upon the final conviction charge (case outcome) in attempting to minimize adverse effects on a physician's license.  This emphasis is too narrow and usually  misplaced.  If there is any conviction of a felony or misdemeanor, the Board can look through the conviction to the underlying facts.  Therefore the contents of the investigative reports, the rulings of the judge on issues such as bail or protective orders, the length and conditions of probation, and negotiated post-conviction relief, are all aspects of the case which have an impact upon whether the Board will seek discipline against a license, and what the disciplinary case outcome might be.

Early and Proactive Rehabilitative Efforts

Another often missed opportunity is the chance to make early and proactive rehabilitative efforts.  If the Board decides to discipline a physician's license, once a conviction is proven at hearing, the burden shifts to the licensee to show rehabilitation to enable the Board or administrative law judge to decide what, if any, discipline is appropriate.  Rehabilitation evidence is critical because the Board justifies discipline based upon criminal convictions by reasoning that criminal convictions show a character flaw, a lack of judgment, or impairment that endangers the public, depending upon the facts of the case.  To the degree that a physician can show the issues in the criminal case have been addressed or resolved by rehabilitative efforts, the justification for discipline may be reduced or removed, resulting in a better discipline case outcome, or perhaps even a case dismissal.

What Types of Cases Trigger Discipline

Unremarkable misdemeanor convictions that do not point to troubling concerns about the licensee are the most likely to not result in license discipline.  These would include low blood alcohol drunk driving cases, disturbing the peace based on loud noise or a fight between adults, some types of disorderly conduct, and misdemeanor Vehicle Code cases.  Criminal cases that are likely to trigger discipline are ones that point to drug or alcohol abuse, have facts that show or hint at mental illness, any type of theft or fraud, any violent crime, and any sex crime, to name some major categories.  Sexual offenses that result in conviction and mandated sex offender registration can trigger immediate license revocation.  To make a reasonable assessment of the potential Board reaction to a particular factual scenario, it is best to hire a license defense law firm to review the matter.  We offer consultations to review criminal matters to assess them for likely licensing outcomes, to identify mitigation evidence early and to build a rehabilitation case. 

Be Honest

It is crucial that a physician never lie to the Medical Board about a criminal case.  Direct dishonesty is typically more damaging than the criminal case itself.  I strongly recommend that the physician have an attorney review all their communications with the Board before they are sent, if for no other reason than to ensure that the information provided is accurate and that the exchanges are well documented.  The early involvement of a license defense attorney can ensure an honest, positive and consistent message that reassures the Medical Board and acts to prevent or minimize license discipline.

Medical Students, Medical Residents and Physician License Applicants

These principles apply to anyone applying to medical school, attending medical school, working in a medical residency, applying for a PTAL (foreign medical school graduate's residency permit) or seeking a California physician's license.  The earlier the issue is addressed, the better.  If the background problem is so serious that it will jeopardize the physician's licensing process, the problem must be identified early so that the individual can consider options and plan for overcoming impediments to obtaining a full clear physician's license.

 

 

The End of Diversion Leaves California's Physicians to Help Themselves

The California Medical Board’s Diversion Program ended June 30, 2008, bringing to a close an important option for getting physicians treatment for substance abuse without creating a record of public discipline that leaves most careers in ruins. 

For those physicians who remained in the Diversion Program as of June 30th, they were placed into two groups: those who would be discharged early from Diversion thanks to their success, and those who would remain “in diversion” supervised by the enforcement arm of the Medical Board of California. For new cases, the Diversion option no longer exists.

The California Medical Board’s Diversion Program could never adequately satisfy the concerns of its critics. A certain portion of the community felt that the program helped shield addicted physicians from public discipline thereby putting the public at risk. On the other hand, the Diversion Program’s resources were so limited that some participants received inadequate treatment and supervision for their addiction, which would lead to positive drug tests and other violations. Such violations created a predicament for the program, because the program was, by its very nature, designed to treat addicted physicians and not to throw them to the wolves by sending them off for formal Board discipline. Nevertheless, the program had to draw the line and punish some physicians with formal discipline. In summary, the program was too lax for some, inadequate for others, and for some others fundamentally punitive in nature, contradicting its stated mission.

California physicians now must proactively seek confidential help for their addictions. Once the Board is involved, the Board, by its mandate, must “protect” the general public by seeking public discipline if warranted. Such disciplinary actions can be career-ending. A physician’s career, as seen through the eyes of this licensing attorney, is a house of cards, those cards being a myriad of licenses, certifications and privileges from boards, hospitals, associations and insurers. One black mark can place each and every license, certification and privilege in jeopardy.

It is, therefore, absolutely critical that physicians who struggle with drug or alcohol addiction, or other mental illness, swiftly and privately seek help. There are several nationally prominent addiction treatment programs, including Hazelden Springbrook in Newberg, Oregon, and the Farley Center at Williamsburg Place in Virginia, which specialize in the treatment of physicians. Locally in southern California, Cornerstone of Southern California is a well-established and prominent program which treats professionals for drug and alcohol addictions. In this post-diversion era, a physician who wants to salvage their career by privately seeking treatment must seek effective treatment through one of these programs without delay.